Sunday, February 16, 2025

John Surratt - Lincoln Conspirator


 John H. Surratt was a member of the Confederate Secret Service. In 1863, he became a messenger for the Confederacy, carrying secret messages to boats on the Potomac River. Some of that information included troop movements around Washington.

Most accounts of the conspiracy say Dr. Samuel Mudd introduced Surratt to Booth on December 23, 1864. However, in 1898, Surratt told George Alfred Townsend, Dr. Mudd never introduced him to Booth. Instead, he had received “a letter of introduction from a valued and trusted friend.”[i]

From the very first, he looked on Booth as a “hot-headed, visionary man.” His “wild scheme” of kidnapping Abraham Lincoln made him laugh in Booth’s face. Booth was eager to draw him into the conspiracy because he “knew every crossroad, bypath, and hiding place in northern Virginia and southern Maryland.”

“Booth said he was willing to take any chance,” said Surratt. “I believe he was a monomaniac on the subject. John Wilkes Booth had brooded over the South’s wrongs so much that his mind was unsettled on the subject...He was unquestionably insane when he shot Lincoln. No man in his right mind would have done that. [John Wilkes Booth] was the South’s worst enemy.”[ii]

John Surratt’s whereabouts on the night of the assassination have been hotly debated for over one-hundred and fifty years. He claimed to be in Elmira, New York, conducting business for the Confederate Secret Service. When he learned about the assassination, Surratt fled to Canada and Rome, becoming a member of the Papal Guard. He was later captured in Alexandria, Egypt, and returned to the United States in 1867. The Government tried John Surratt in a civil court and dropped all charges against him, making Surratt the only conspirator to escape prosecution.

The newspapers summed it up best. “Many thousands of dollars must have been expended to bring about the capture of John Surratt, but now having obtained his body, the authorities seemed totally at a loss to know what they should do with him. Since it was far from certain that John Surratt was guilty, the most generous and politic course was to let him have the benefit of the doubt.”[iii]

 



[i] Evening Star. July 7, 1865.

[ii] Semi-Weekly Messenger. April 19, 1898.

[iii] Public Ledger. November 17, 1868.

No comments:

Post a Comment